cooljev.中文
← All scenarios

SCENARIO / ARTICLES

Keep articles you can put to work

Look for actionable steps and concrete results before deeper verification.

Who this is for Researchers and content teams building a practical reference library.

Authored examples · No live inference

Define the decision first

  1. Check whether steps and results are present; do not certify the claim.
  2. General advice is not an actionable step. A number is not proof of a sound experiment.
  3. An excerpt cannot establish that something is absent from the full article.

Decide first, then compare

01 / EXERCISE
{
  "article": "Reduced the signup form from seven fields to three: removed job title and company size, and combined name fields. Completion rose from 28% to 39% in two weeks, with a comparison table.",
  "complete_material": true
}
How would you classify this using the criteria above?
Read all examples and authored answers

Typical example · Add to verification list

{
  "article": "Reduced the signup form from seven fields to three: removed job title and company size, and combined name fields. Completion rose from 28% to 39% in two weeks, with a comparison table.",
  "complete_material": true
}

Actions and results are present; sample size, controls and sources still need verification.

Next action: Save with a source-verification task, not a proven improvement claim.

Counterexample · Missing practical material

{
  "article": "The key to conversion is understanding users, improving experience and thinking long term.",
  "complete_material": true
}

No concrete changes or checkable results are described.

Next action: Do not add to the practical reference library yet.

Insufficient information · Insufficient information

{
  "article": "Here is how we improved conversion… (remaining article unavailable)",
  "complete_material": false
}

Only an introduction is available; the full article cannot be assessed.

Next action: Obtain the full material before screening.

Adapt the template to your task

02 / CONFIGURE

Edit the material and question criteria to create a request. Stable field names stay in English for code. Editing does not run a model or change the authored answers above.

Questions and criteria

Stable field IDs; editable criteria and options
has_steps noul
has_results noul
complete_material noul

REQUEST.JSON

View the Python call
Download the original request 
Run in your own environment
03 / BUILD
  1. Download and extract the examples
    Python 3.10+; no third-party dependencies. Run from the directory containing examples/.
    Download all example code
  2. Start with authored offline examples
    python -m examples.hello_jev articles --mode offline --language en
    This checks the local workflow, not model quality. Changed inputs cannot replay old fixture answers.
  3. Use a real account when you are ready
    Set TYPESAFE_API_KEY locally and put request.json in the project root. Live calls send material to TypeSafe and may incur charges. Live interoperability has not been tested in this edition.
    python -m examples.hello_jev articles --mode live --language en --request request.json
    Open the official Playground · Account and environment setup
Understand the method
Related build: pre-publication checks Question design 
Request fields checked against the official API reference on 2026-09-20. API reference